| 
 SPOTTHE MISTAKES!
 Page 31
 
  
 		Page 1  
 Page 2   
 Page 3   
  Page 4    
  Page 5  
  Page 6  
  Page 7  
  Page 8  
  Page 9Page 10  
  Page 11  
  Page 12  
  Page 13  
  Page 14  
  Page 15  
  Page 16  
  Page 17
 Page 18 
  Page 19  
  Page 20 
  Page 21 
  Page 22 
  Page 23 
  Page 24  
  Page 25
 Page 26  
  Page 27  
  Page 28  
  Page 29 
  Page 30   
  Page 32 
  Page 33
 
   I have especially kept Talking Electronics website simple and easy to download.
 All the other sites are filled with advertising and the articles are 
		cut-up between adverts, with the page taking a long time to load and 
		impossible to save. Most of them are not worth saving, in any case.
 I don't care if I only get a few readers for some of the articles. It is 
		those few readers that will benefit from the discussion and, after all, 
		only one in 10,000 understand electronics. So it is a very exclusive club 
		that we are preaching to.
 The main things is this: we are getting across technical material that 
		has never been covered before.
 You can see the need for learning the "in's and out's" of electronics as 
		so many forums have technical personnel advising the reader with quite 
		bazaar solutions or a complex solution when a simple circuit is all that 
		is required.
 And you can still see magazines producing projects that show the 
		design-engineer has little or no understanding of what is is presenting.
 If only they had read the 30 pages of "Spot The Mistake" they would be 
		enormously better informed.
 It's amazing. Not one text book has ever presented a faulty circuit and 
		explained the faults and how to fix them.
 That's why, coming from a background of fixing 35,000 TV's, I could see 
		many design-problems and many ways to help others find and fix a fault 
		without having to spend hours looking in the wrong location.
 
 You have to be aware of what is happening in China. They are releasing and using very low-cost microcontrollers that hardly 
		get a mention outside China and consequently the projects using them are 
		50% better than we can achieve.
 PIC has release a Chinese-only version and STC has a very low cost 
		micro.
 This signals the "beginning of the end."
 We have already seen COB micros for 5 cents in 10 second speech and 
		sound modules and these have dominated the Birthday card market. But 
		no-one buys cards any more and I wonder where the next mass-market will 
		appear from.
 The only thing the mass market are promoting is the smart use of generating 
		electricity and storing it within the home.
 They are hoping battery storage will be come economical and provide the 
		independence we frantically need.
 But when you consider a car battery will deliver 0.5kwhr, it will only 
		run a one-bar radiator for 30 minutes, these $5,000 Power-Walls are 
		really only a gimmick.
 Who would pay $5,000 for $2.00 worth of electricity each day? Most homes 
		would need two Power-Walls to cover the nightly requirement.
 You certainly could not turn on the tumble dryer and kettle at the same 
		time or do any worthwhile electric cooking.
 However they are going to keep flogging these Power-wall batteries, just like solar 
		panels and create work for installers and servicemen.
 So far, the introduction of solar panels on top of houses has made very little 
impact on electricity requirements as all these households return to the 
power-grid at nighttime.
 
	
		
				
		
			
	
		
		 I have added very little to this 
Spot The Mistake 
 		series over the past few months 
because the sources of my material have stopped producing junk articles. Finally, my efforts to make authors desist, have sunken-in, and they have 
stopped producing projects that don't work.
 Of course they have never responded to my emails but the fact they have stopped 
publishing projects without being tested, is sufficient testament to my success.
 The reply from editors of the magazines with: "No-one 
else has complained." does not wash with me. Of course no-one has 
complained because my complaints are very technical and very few would be aware 
of the mistake and even fewer would bother to write to the magazine.
 From the replies I receive on various electronics forums I can see the general 
understand of basic electronics is very low.
 And I can understand why.
 Where are they to get their knowledge from?
 Universities don't have a clue.
 Nothing is provided in any text books and there is no-where you can go to get a 
sensible answer.
 I am not talking about formulae and derivatives.
 I am talking about how and why a circuit works or doesn't work.
 Everyone relies on SIMULATION SOFTWARE and exactly the same software resides in 
my head.
 I can see a circuit working in exactly the same way as the simulation package 
works. That means I don't have to draw the circuit or wait for an answer.
 The software package will provide waveforms and timing diagrams but if you don't 
understand the circuit thoroughly, these graphs will only create more confusion.
 The same thing happens when you put a CRO on a project.
 The waveform can include lots of glitches and spikes that are not registered by 
the components in the circuit and this can cause additional confusion.
 
	
		
				
		
			
	
		
		 When I look back and see how many things I initiated and changed 
and invented, the list is enormous. I lived in the period of time when everything changed, from the valve era to 
the transistor era to the integrated circuit era to the microcontroller era and 
large-scale integration.
 No only did the transistor radio get invented but the walkman, transistor TV's 
and then the computer.
 Finally we have the mobile phone, internet and microscopic electronic gadgets 
for every requirement.
 The small part I played in this dynamic change can still be felt by those 
thousands of readers of my magazines and books.
 I was the first to describe a circuit and include a section IF IT DOESN'T WORK.
 All magazines expect the circuit to work and they never had a repair section or 
any capability of sorting out the problem. This left the builder with a DUD 
project and possibly put the builder OFF building anything more.
 Talking Electronics had a repair section and a phone response.
 And it was the first in the world to provide kits for 
every project described in the magazine and put PC boards on the front of the magazine to encourage 
constructors to build the project.
 Not only that, but the PC boards had a overlay and tinned lands. The other 
boards at the time had no overlay and just copper on the underside and no visual 
indication of the name of the project.  Sometimes letters such as "NHCD 
234" or  "OCT 1986"
 It was no wonder that none of these junk projects were a success and yet the 
magazines went on each month without any intention of providing anything better for the 
beginner.
 And it still holds today.  Almost none of the magazines include a beginners 
article and simply including a single article is very little reward for buying 
the magazine.
 I was the first to produce a magazine with no advertising. I am sick and tired 
of flipping past all the advertising and finally getting to a few articles at 
the end of the magazine.
 I brought out my magazine just at the peak of the transition-time.
 Things have now changed and the requirements for electronics engineers have 
dwindled to such an extent that they have almost vanished.
 Designs are now carried out around microcontrollers and large scale integrated 
chips and multilayer boards with overseas engineers that are capable of 
producing a product at a price that you cannot compete with.
 You cannot buy a plastic box for the price of their completed project.
 That's how much things have changed.
 You see hundreds of new chips and components being developed but when you go to 
the inventory of a large wholesale supplier you see the stock has changed very 
little over a period of 18 months. The 47 items they have "got rid of" have 
either been "free samples" or a "sample to try" and maybe a few sales.
 I provided circuits each month to an Indian magazine and included my email 
address in the article, plus the 
cost of a kit. Not a single order or reply or request for information came to me 
in a period of 18 months.
 That's a 100% conclusion. The second largest magazine in India has a readership 
(with electronics understanding) 
of virtually ZERO.
 When you go to their Forums, the questions and answers indicate everyone is 
crying out for a little education in the electronics field. There is nothing, 
anywhere, to help them.
 It does not matter if a LIFETIME CAREER is not available for these enthusiasts. 
It is more important to give them a hobby and an interest, just like the 
enormous number who took up modeling (such as yachts, boats, scenery etc) and 
model railways and wood-working.
 It provides, peace, enjoyment, contentment and achievement.
 It's a bit like the music industry. There is very little outlet for a musician 
or singer, but millions are practicing 10 hours a day because of the love of 
achievement.
 It all revolves around gaining knowledge and achieving a goal. Achieving SUCCESS 
and gaining IMPROVEMENT.
 And this spurs you on to wanting to know more and knowing you are  SUCCESS.
 It's only internal success that you have to achieve. Once you have that, you can 
impart your success to others (younger) and show how to maintain stability.
 TO STAND FIRM WHEN ALL THE WORLD IS CRUMBING AROUND YOU.
 
 
  
 Here's some poor and bad advice from an electronics forum:
 Hi . . . I purchased a 12 volts 800mA, DC adapter and the output is 16.54 volts!
 
 Answer from the technical supervisor:
 The
		resistance in the 
		windings of miles of thin wire in its transformer so its voltage drops 
		to its rating when it has its rated load current.
 
 The supervisor is referring to the primary winding and this is 
		incorrect.
 The thickness of the primary winding has very little impact on the 
		voltage-drop.
 If the primary can maintain flux in the core when the maximum current is 
		being drawn, it is doing its job. And almost any thickness wire 
		will do this as the wattage is less than 15 watts in this case.
 The voltage drop is due to the resistance of the secondary winding,
 Just because a certain gauge wire in the secondary will carry 1 amp as a jumper lead, 
		does not mean it will deliver 1 amp as a secondary winding of a transformer, 
		without producing high losses.
 To deliver 1 amp with low-loss, you need to use 5 amp wire but this will 
		take up a lot of space and you will need a larger core.
 It is not the current-carrying capacity of the secondary winding but the 
		thickness of the wire and its ability to allow 1 amp to pass to the 
		output. It needs a much-thicker wire to deliver 1 amp. To prove the 
		issue, if you wind 2 turns of very thick "strapping" for the secondary, 
		it will produce 10 amps. The voltage will be less than 1 volt, but the 
		current will be 10 or more amps when you "short" the two ends together.
 So the manufacturer uses thinner wire and winds 20% more turns, so the voltage is high 
		on no-load and drops to the specified voltage when full current flows.
 
 "Try connecting a 470 Ohm (or thereabouts) resistor at the output and 
		measure the volts again. What do you get?"
 
 This is another piece of useless advice from a non technical person.
 A 470 ohm resistor will draw 30mA and the voltage will drop a few 
		millivolts.
 You need to connect two 8 ohm resistors in series to get something like 
		700mA to test the transformer.
  
 Using Bipolar Transistors 
			As Switches  by Mike Martell
 While transistors have many uses, one of the less known uses by 
			amateurs is the ability for bipolar transistors to turn things on 
			and off. While there are limitations as to what we can switch on and 
			off, transistor switches offer lower cost and substantial 
			reliability over conventional mechanical relays. In this article, we 
			will review the basic principles for transistor switches using 
			common bipolar transistors.
 
 The most commonly used transistor switch is the PNP variety shown in 
			Figure 1. The secret to making a transistor switch work properly is 
			to get the transistor in a saturation state. For this to happen we 
			need to know the maximum load current for the device to be turned on 
			and the minimum HFE of the transistor. For example, if we have a 
			load that requires 100MA of current and a transistor with a minimum 
			HFE of 100, we can then calculate the minimum base current required 
			to saturate the transistor as follows:
 
 Saying a PNP stage is "the most commonly used stage"	is completely wrong because the voltage on the base has to be 
raised to nearly 12v to turn the transistor OFF and and many controlling 
circuits have an output voltage of 5v (such as microcontrollers) and you need 
extra circuitry to control this type of circuit.
 HFE   should be Hfe
 100MA  should be 100mA    (100MA is one hundred MEGA AMPS - 
Such as from a power station - no transistor can control 100Mega Amps)
 
 
	
	
		
			| Minimum base current = 
			100 MA / 100 Minimum base current = 1 MA
 Minimum collector current = 
			100 mA / 100
 Minimum base current = 1 mA
 
 In actual practice, it is best to 
			calculate about 30% more current than we will need to guarantee our 
			transistor switch is always saturated.  In this case, we will use 
			1.3 mA. We must also select our supply voltage, so for this example 
			we will use 12 volts. We can now calculate resistor R1 in the 
			circuit as follows:
 
 Maximum Current Required = 100mA
 Supply Voltage = 12 Volts
 |  |  
			| R1 = Supply Voltage / ( Maximum Current Required / Minimum HFE * 1.3 
			)
 R1 = 12 / (.1 / 100 * 1.3)
 R1 = 9230.7 or 10K for nearest standard value.
 R1 = 9230.7 or 10k for nearest standard value.
 
 Resistor R2 is not essential to this circuit but is generally used 
			for stability and to insure that the transistor switch is completely 
			turned off. This resistor insures that the base of the transistor 
			does not go slightly negative which would cause a very small amount 
			of collector current to flow. The value of this resistor is not 
			critical but a value about 10 times R1 is normally chosen. For this 
			circuit we will calculate R2 to be 10 times R1 as follows:
 
 R2 = 10 * 10000
 R2 = 100K
 R2 = 100k
 
 To turn ON our transistor switch, all that is needed is to short 
			resistor R1 to the negative ground.
 
 I don't like the word "short."    It should be 
			"take."  I don't like "negative ground"    Just 
			use the word "ground."   It is the negative of the 
			battery, but if you use the word "negative"  it will conjure up 
			the possibility that the supply is both positive and negative, like 
			a dual power supply:  +12v  and -12v.
 
 PNP buffers  (BUFFER STAGE - INVERTER AMPLIFIER STAGE - "SWITCH" 
			) are very difficult to get working because the incoming signal has 
			to rise to 12v (in this example) and if it just rises to 11.5v, the 
			circuit will not turn OFF.  Even a 555 will not work in this 
			example because the output of a 555 on a 12v supply will only rise 
			to 11v.
 The driver circuit MUST be on the same rail as the BUFFER because if 
			they are different by as little as 0.5v, the BUFFER will not turn 
			OFF.
 
 |  
			| While PNP transistors are normally used for a negative ground 
			configuration, it is possible use a NPN
 What is a "negative ground 
			configuration??"
 transistor if a positive 
			ground configuration is desired as indicated in Figure 2. The 
			calculation of resistor values is identical to the PNP version. 
			However, in the NPN transistor, R1 must be shorted to the positive 
			of the supply to turn the switch on.
 
 While our transistor switch can easily replace many mechanical 
			relays, it does have a few drawbacks. The maximum design current 
			must not be exceeded or the output voltage will be reduced. A short 
			circuit of the output will overheat and destroy the transistor in 
			many cases. Although the transistor is in saturation when turned on, 
			about .3 volts is lost through the collector to the emitter of the 
			transistor. We must also insure that the maximum power dissipation 
			of the transistor is not exceeded. We can calculate the power 
			dissipation by multiplying the current by .3 volts. In the case of 
			100 mA, the transistor must be able to withstand 30 milliwatts (.3 
			times .1).
 
 |  |  
			| Transistor switches are used for a 
			wide variety of applications. Many amateurs will notice that the 
			circuit in Figure 1 is used as the PTT in many transmitter circuits. 
			Transistor switches are commonly used to turn on transmitter 
			circuits, LED’s, cooling fans and even relays. However, when using a 
			transistor to turn on a relay coil, it is very important to use a 
			1N4001 diode reversed biased in parallel with the relay coil as in 
			Figure 3. This is to prevent the kickback voltage in the reverse 
			polarity from destroying the transistor. This reverse voltage occurs 
			momentarily when the normal current stops flowing through the coil. 
			It is good practice to always use a diode when turning on any 
			inductive load. Transistor switches are often used to take the 
			low-level output from logic circuits to turn on or turn off a 
			particular device. |  |  
			| The actual transistor used as 
a switch is not critical in these applications. Virtually any general purpose 
NPN or PNP transistor can be used as a switch. All that is needed is to know the 
minimum HFE and the power dissipation of the transistor. While most transistors 
in a TO-92 case will have HFE’s of at least 100, many power transistors in 
TO-220 cases often have an HFE no greater than 25. It is essential to know the 
HFE or Beta of a transistor, so that we can have a large enough base current to 
achieve saturation. If a power transistor is used to turn on a high current 
device, it may be necessary to use another lower current transistor switch to 
drive a transistor switch used in a high current application. This is especially 
important when using a low current logic output from a CMOS IC.
 
 One of the biggest traps in designing a BUFFER stage occurs when driving or 
illuminating a globe.
 A globe takes about 6 times more current when starting to illuminate because the 
cold filament has a very low resistance. The resistance increases enormously 
when it is fully glowing.
 This means the current required to get the globe to illuminate is 6 times the 
operating current.
 This even applies to a 12v 100mA globe and if you only consider 100mA when 
selecting a transistor and the base resistance, the globe will not turn ON.
 And you will wonder why.
 Now you know.
 
 |  
			|  
The author has gone to a lot of detail in how to work out the 
value of each resistor.  He states it is best to assume a transistor has a 
gain of 50, and then states the circuit above has a very high gain. He does not understand the basis of the gain of a stage where 4 resistors are 
used to create the biasing.
 The final gain of the stage is simply the division of the load resistor by the 
resistance of the emitter resistor. For the first stage this is 1200/180 = 6 and 
for the second stage the gain is 560/100 = 5.6  This give the circuit a 
total gain of 33 and there will be lots of losses in the 3 coupling 
electrolytics.
 The 4u7 and 10u in the emitters will increase the gain enormously.
 
 The circuit has extremely low values of biasing components and with the low 
value of coupling components, it is doubtful if the output would give any 
results AT ALL.
 
 Let me give just one important way to look at how a circuit works.
 The 1k2 on the first stage "pulls" the electro UP and delivers a signal to the 
second stage. The transistor DOES NOT DO ANYTHING  !!!!
 The input of the second stage is 1k (actually less).
 Replace the 4u7 with a link and you will see the voltage at the mid-point cannot 
be higher than half-rail voltage. A voltage divider is formed with the 1k2 and 
1k.
 Thus the waveform can only extend from a low voltage (a few volts) to 6v.
 See how the low values of input resistance (impedance) can reduce the waveform 
considerably.
 
 SIGNIFICANT FIGURES
 Significant figures 
is a technical term for providing an answer that is more accurate than the 
figures given in the question.
 This applies very much to transistors.
 To turn ON a transistor may require a base current that is one-hundredth of the 
collector current. But if the resistance of the load is halved, it will need 
more than twice the base current.
 To make sure the transistor is fully turn ON, we often double the base current 
to make sure.
 This means talking about a base resistor with a value 9230.7 ohms is quite 
absurd:
 R1 = 9230.7 or 10K for nearest standard value.
 R1 = 9230.7 or 10k for nearest standard value.
 as the value will be in the range 10k or as low as 4k7 or even 2k2 and this is 
far from the "accurate value" of 
9230.7 ohms  !!
 In this example, the only significant figure is "9" and the other digits need to 
be "0's" as even the value of "9" will be changed to a value as low as "2."      
"9" is the only value of importance and the other figures are considered to 
provide a result that is of a higher quality than the original data. In other 
words, its accuracy cannot be  justified and it is what we call: "going 
overboard."
 It is absurd, providing an accurate value when the final result will be 
completely different. This is just one thing to remember when providing 
"PHYSICAL RESULTS."
 It shows your understanding or lack of understanding of PHYSICS. The answer has 
to be in accord with the accuracy of the WORST value in the question (called the 
DATA).
 |  
	
		
				
		
			
	
		
		 
 PCB power is an Indian company. I asked for a quotation on a Printed Circuit 
board panel and the cost was $120.00 plug freight.  I had the panel made in 
China for $10.00  !!!     
   Here is a 4x4 Matrix kit supplied by PCB Power.  The cost is $21.00 USD  
!!    An Indian earns on a few dollars a day !!!!            
 Here is the same 4x4 Matrix on eBay.  It costs $1.00 (post free).          This is a typical example of the corruption produced when a government does 
not allow the citizens to buy products from overseas. The manufacturers within a 
country can exploit the population. All the electronics products produced in 
India are very second-rate as hey do not have the resources, infrastructure, 
know-how or the demand to produce items of a standard that is demanded today.
 It is absurd that India and Russia produce items in competition with China 
because they simply cannot compete and they are just making fools of themselves. 
They are producing designs that we bought 10 years ago and are currently 
throwing on the tip.
 
 
	
		
				
		
			
	
		
		   
	
		
				
				
				
		
			
	
   
 
   
 
   
  Page 1 
  Page 2 
  Page 3 
  Page 4 
  Page 5 
  Page 6 
  Page 7 
  Page 8 
  Page 9Page 10 
  Page 11 
  Page 12 
  Page 13 
  Page 14 
  Page 15 
  Page 16 
  Page 17
 Page 18 
  Page 19  
  Page 20 
  Page 21 
  Page 22 
  Page 23 
  Page 24 
  Page 25
 Page 26  
  Page 27  
  Page 28  
  Page 29 
  Page 30   
  Page 32 
  Page 33
 
 |